Nuclear Meltdown Would Cause Fewer Deaths than Thought, NRC Finds
August 2nd, 2011 by 
A new analysis being produced by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) estimates that a meltdown at a nuclear plant would cause far fewer human fatalities than previously believed.
While earlier studies calculated that a meltdown caused by a prolonged loss of electric power could release as much as 60 percent of the radioactive cesium contained in a typical plant’s reactor core, the new study suggests that just 1 to 2 percent of the radioactive material would likely escape, with most of the material remaining inside the reactor building.
And even large-scale nuclear releases would occur over a long period of time, allowing people living within a 10-mile radius enough time to evacuate, according to the New York Times, which received a draft copy from the watchdog group, the Union of Concerned Scientists.
According to the report, which officials intended to release next spring, just one person in 4,348 living within 10 miles would be expected to develop “latent cancer” as a result of exposure to radiation. Critics called the NRC calculations overly optimistic.
Among other things, the calculations assume successful evacuation and “average” weather conditions, said Edwin Lyman, a nuclear physicist with the Union of Concerned Scientists.
Article appearing courtesy Yale Environment 360.
photo: redjar.
|
|
Tags:  electric power meltdown nuclear plant Nuclear Regulatory Commission radioactive material reactor | [ Permalink ] |
The Union of Concerned Scientists are anti-nuclear activists headed by Lyman who does not wish to allow the American people to use nuclear power and uses Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt tactics to try to achieve his goal – and that of his organization. For a commentary on this story about the NRC visit http://atomicinsights.com/2011/08.....t-nuclear-energy-counteracting-focused-fud.html
Ah. I feel much better now.